SURVEYING & MAPPING

Upgraded RTK Rover
Features MFi certification

The Reach RX Network real-time kinematics (RTK) rover has been upgraded to include new MFi (Made for iPhone/iPad) certification and is fully compatible with ArcGIS, QGIS and other GIS apps for both iOS and Android. Reach RX can be seamlessly integrated into GIS workflows to help industry professionals and teams collect accurate geodata at scale.

The Reach RX offers precise positioning while receiving corrections through NTRIP and tracks GPS/QZSS, Galileo, GLONASS and BeiDou. It gets a fix in less than 5 seconds, delivering centimeter-level accuracy even in challenging conditions.

It can be used for engineering, utility inspection, landscaping and other projects of any scale. According to the company, the rover will soon be compatible with QField, Blue Marble’s Global Mapper, Mergin Maps, Avenza Maps and more.

The Reach RX weighs 250 grams; is IP68-rated, waterproof and dustproof; and withstands temperatures from -20° C to +65° C.Emlid, emlid.com

Photogrammetric Software
Upgraded coordinate system functionalities

3Dsurvey 3.0 is an all-in-one photogrammetric software solution designed to unify lidar sensors, cameras on UAVs and various ground control points. Users can transition between orthophotos, point clouds and textured meshes.

Version 3.0 features upgraded coordinate system functionalities to obtain georeferenced spatial data without local transformations.

It includes improved coordinate system support, which handles transformations requiring special grid files and offers accurate GPS-to-local coordinate conversions. Additionally, the platform can automatically fetch missing geoid models.

The revamped coordinate system selection process includes presets for users to find the correct system by entering their country name, with the appropriate settings applied automatically. It has PRJ file support to enhance compatibility with various GIS standards. 3Dsurvey, 3dsurvey.si

RTK Evaluation Kit
Includes L1+L2 RTK GNSS

This real-time kinematics (RTK) evaluation kit (EVK) serves as a development platform for fixed or mobile high-precision positioning and navigation needs.

The RTK EVK comes with a range of options for prototyping, including L1+L2 RTK GNSS, with L-Band correction built-in if needed, running on an agile processor.

It features custom open-source software pre-loaded with RTK Everywhere firmware. Users can configure the EVK as an RTK base and push corrections to an NTRIP Caster or use corrections delivered through WiFi or Bluetooth.

The integrated u-blox NEO-D9S offers L-Band reception and access to correction services such as PointPerfect. The u-blox LARA-R6001D provides global cellular connectivity, and Zero-Touch RTK offers users a simple way to receive corrections. Users can register the device and enable PointPerfect — no NTRIP credentials are required. Sparkfun Electronics, sparkfun.com

GNSS Receiver
With tilt compensation

The R980 features communication capabilities to support uninterrupted field operations. It can be used for land surveying, transportation infrastructure, construction, energy, oil and gas, utilities and mining projects.

The system features Trimble’s ProPoint GNSS positioning engine and inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based tilt compensation, making it suitable for dense urban environments and under tree canopy, removing the need to level the pole when capturing data points.

It includes a dual-band UHF radio and an integrated worldwide LTE modem for receiving corrections from a local base station or VRS network. It supports the Trimble Internet Base Station Service (IBSS) for streaming RTK corrections using Trimble Access field software and features Trimble IonoGuard technology, which mitigates ionospheric disturbances for RTK GNSS. Trimble Geospatial, geospatial.trimble.com

Nautical Chart Production
Generate charts in PDF/TIF from ENC data

CARIS AutoChart, a nautical chart production solution, is tailored to the needs of nautical chart producers. It can automatically generate charts in PDF/TIF from ENC data. Users can seamlessly import data from ENC files to create comprehensive nautical charts in PDF and/or TIF format. CARIS AutoChart can generate chart templates from existing chart portfolios maintained with CARIS paper chart composer or CARIS HPD paper chart editor.

The software is designed to accommodate the unique needs of chart production facilities of all sizes. It can be used by hydrographic offices, port or waterways authorities.Teledyne Geospatial, teledyneimaging.com

Upgraded GIS Platform
Featuring native database integrations

Felt 3.0 includes new features and native database integrations to improve the capabilities of geographic information systems (GIS). It provides modern GIS tools for teams to visualize, analyze and present important insights and map data relevant to their operations.

Operators can directly connect Postgres/PostGIS and Snowflake databases for automated live data updates. The API allows users to create and style elements and listen to map updates via webhooks, while providing a Python SDK for professionals to continue to work in their preferred tools. Felt, felt.com

UAV

Gimbaled Camera
For UAV missions

The Gimbal 155 is a gimbaled camera designed for the UAV Survey Mission program. The GOS-155 meets UAV requirements for surveillance and rescue missions. Its optimized size, weight and power (SwaP) profile, advanced day and night ISR imaging, and embedded video processor make it ideal for any mid-sized UAV — whether VTOL or winged. With its low weight of 1.8 kg, and 155 mm, UAV platforms can increase endurance without sacrificing optical performance.

The GOS-155 two-axial gimbal is an EO/IR system, comprising a 30x optical zoom HD (1280 x 720) visible camera paired with a fixed focal length uncooled thermal LWIR (1280 x 1024) camera. This allows users to collect intricate visuals across visible and infrared spectrums.

It includes embedded video processing with electronic stabilization and object tracking and can be integrated with external GPS/INS with real-time target location at 20 m across multiple environments, and around 5 m using UAVOS’ Ground Control Station software. UAVOS, uavos.com

Tactical Grade INS
Tailored to unmanned systems

The FN 200C combines multiple functions into a single integrated platform. It features a three-in-one strapdown system compromising motion reference unit (MRU), attitude and heading reference system (AHRS) and inertial navigation system (INS) capabilities for precise positioning, velocity and orientation data in both static and dynamic movements.

It is equipped with fiber optic gyroscopes (FOG) and MEMS accelerometers. The FN 200C’s inertial measurement unit (IMU) offers accurate and reliable navigation data even in challenging conditions. The system supports various correction methods such as SBAS, DGPS, RTK, and PPP for real-time navigation and positioning in a wide range of applications.

The FN 200C utilizes NovAtel OEM7, u-blox ZED-F9P or Septentrio mosaic-H GNSS receivers to provide precise positioning information across multiple GNSS constellations. With embedded anti-jamming and spoofing features, the FN 200C offers reliable operation in environments where signal interference may be present.

The FN 200C is ideal for unmanned systems applications, including land-based surveying, aerial mapping, maritime navigation and more, delivering precise and reliable navigation data to meet the most demanding requirements. According to FIBERPRO, the system’s advanced technology, robust design and comprehensive feature set ensure that it will revolutionize navigation and operation in today’s dynamic and challenging environments. FIBERPRO, fiberpro.com

Upgraded UAV
With a modifiable flight controller

The RDSX Pelican extended-range hybrid vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) delivery UAV is now offered with an easily modifiable flight controller, designed for users to more readily integrate customized flight systems and companion software.

The RDSX Pelican combines the reliability and flight stability of a multirotor craft with the extended range of a fixed-wing airframe. Its customizable payload bay can be factory-integrated with the A2Z Drone Delivery RDS2 commercial delivery winch to support a variety of logistics operations.

Engineered to operate within the FAA’s 55-pound max takeoff weight for Part 107 compliance, the Pelican is rated to carry payloads up to 5 kg on operations up to 40 km roundtrip. The flexibility of the Pelican’s cargo bay makes it ideal for logistics missions or deployment with payloads customized for aerial mapping, UAV inspection, forestry services, search and rescue operations, water sample collection, offshore deliveries, mining and more.

With the RDSX Pelican now operating on the Cube flight controller (CUAV X7+), users can integrate their preferred systems — including ground control software, radio beacons and other companion software systems. A2Z Drone Delivery, a2zdronedelivery.com

GNSS Positioning Modules
Compatible with UAVs and robotics

The Linnet ZED-F9P is built around u-blox’s ZED-F9P RTK module. It offers multiband signal reception including GPS L1 and L2 for precise positioning, even in areas with low satellite coverage. In addition to USB-C connectivity, it features UART, SPI and I2C interfaces for easy integration into a variety of UAV and robotics platforms.

Linnet Mosaic X5 RTK-GNSS module is based on Septentrio’s mosaic-X5 module, with multifrequency signal tracking including GPS L5. The module features an onboard CPU that runs a full internal web-based user interface for configuration and monitoring, as well as integrated NTRIP corrections. Other capabilities include built-in anti-jamming and anti-spoofing protection and a spectrum analyzer. Systork, systork.io

MOBILE

“Patch-In-A-Patch” Antenna
Maintains dual-band L1/L5 performance

Inception is a new GNSS L1/L5 ultra-low-profile “patch-in-a-patch” antenna. The HP5354.A offers dual-band stacked patch performance in a single 35 mm x 35 mm x 4 mm form factor. This design integrates the second antenna within the first, eliminating the need for stacking parts and reducing the antenna height by 50%.

The HP5354.A antenna features a passive, dual-feed surface mount design (SMD) to decrease weight and conserve horizontal space. This makes it suitable for GNSS applications requiring high precision and limited space. The antenna improves positioning accuracy from 3 m to 1.5 m while maintaining dual-band L1/L5 performance.

With a passive peak gain of 2.61 dBi, the HP5354.A can be used for GPS L1/L5, BeiDou B1, Galileo E1, and GLONASS G1 operations. Its dual-feed design maintains circular polarization gain even when the antenna is de-tuned or requires in-situ tuning.

It is ideal for applications such as asset tracking, smart agriculture, industrial tracking, commercial UAVs and autonomous vehicles. The HP5354.A uses Taoglas’ custom electro-ceramics formula, ensuring high-quality performance and seamless integration into devices requiring high-precision GNSS.

The Taoglas HC125A hybrid coupler can combine the dual feeds for the L1 patch, offering high RHCP gain and optimal axial ratio for upper constellations including GPS L1, BeiDou B1, Galileo E1 and GLONASS G1. The Taoglas TFM.100B L1/L5 front-end module can be incorporated into the device PCB, aiming to save valuable real estate and up to two years of complex design work, according to the company. Taoglas, taoglas.com

Waterproof GNSS Antenna
Built-in LNA

The external antenna features an adhesive mount and sealed IP67-rated waterproof protection. It is an active GPS/GNSS antenna that includes a built-in low noise amplifier (LNA) for enhanced performance, making it ideal for applications where the receiver is close to the antenna and in environments where signal strength is strong, such as open areas with a clear line of sight.

This type of antenna can amplify weak signals received from satellites by improving signal quality and reducing noise. It requires an external power source to operate the built-in LNA and is less sensitive to signal loss due to longer cable lengths. It is connected to an SMA connector at the end of a 3 m pigtail. The antennas can be used in navigation, location-based services and fleet management applications. Amphenol RF, amphenolrf.com

DEFENSE

AI and Quantum-Powered Navigation System
When GPS signals are compromised

AQNav is designed for navigation across air, land and sea when GPS signals are jammed or unavailable.

AQNav is a geomagnetic navigation system that uses proprietary artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, powerful quantum sensors and the Earth’s crustal magnetic field. The system seeks to provide an un-jammable, all-weather, terrain-agnostic, real-time navigation solution in situations where GPS signals are unavailable, denied or spoofed.

The system uses extremely sensitive quantum magnetometers to acquire data from Earth’s crustal magnetic field, which exhibits geographically unique patterns. It uses AI algorithms to compare this data against known magnetic maps, allowing the system to quickly and accurately find its position.

It is available globally, does not rely on visual ground features or satellite transmissions to function and is not affected by weather conditions. AQNav can be integrated into a wide variety of platforms. Its passive technology emits no electronic signals, which reduces the aircraft’s detectability. SandboxAQ, sandboxaq.com

PNT Solution
Operates with or without GNSS signals

TRNAV is a terrestrial navigation solution designed to operate with or without GNSS signals.

It establishes a mesh network of ground stations capable of operating independently from GNSS by using precise pre-established locations or connecting to GNSS when available. TRNAV’s synchronized timing system ensures a minimal drift of 10 ns during a week without GNSS.

The system features a re-synchronization capability that allows the entire network to be updated instantly when just one station reconnects to a GNSS satellite, maintaining high precision across all platforms. Users can integrate mobile stations to enhance network flexibility and range, with the potential to cover distances up to 250 km.

TRNAV also offers a high-bandwidth communication channel for communication capabilities within the established network. The system employs AES-256 encryption and advanced waveform technologies, including DSSS/FHSS for robust and secure operations in challenging environments. TUALCOM, tualcom.com

Software-Defined Radio
Designed for mission-critical systems

Calamine is a four-channel wide tuning range software-defined radio (SDR) that can be integrated into mission-critical systems for the defense, GNSS, communications and test and measurement markets.

The SDR offers a tuning range from near DC to 40 GHz with four independent receiver radio chains, each offering 300 MSPS sampling bandwidth. It is tailored to government, defense and intelligence communities and civil users with direct applications for radar systems, signal intelligence, spectrum monitoring and satellite communications systems. Per Vices, pervices.com

C-UAS Solution
For electronic warfare

The Skyjacker is a multi-domain electronic warfare counter unmanned aerial system (C-UAS), suitable against swarms and high-speed threats. It is designed as a response to threats posed by UAVs in the battlespace and at sensitive installations.

Skyjacker alters the trajectory of a UAS by simulating the GNSS signals that guide it toward its target.

Skyjacker is particularly well suited to countering saturation attacks, such as swarming UAVs. The system also can defeat isolated drones piloted remotely by an operator and deliver effects at ranges from 1 km to 10 km (6 mi).

It can be integrated with an array of sensors, such as optronic sights, radars, radiofrequency detectors, lasers, communication jammers and other effectors. Skyjacker can be deployed as a mobile version or interconnected with existing surveillance and fire control systems on land vehicles or naval vessels. Safran Electronics & Defense, safran-group.com

<p>The post Launchpad: GNSS antennas and receivers, UAV upgrades, defense solutions and more first appeared on GPS World.</p>

The New York Times described it as “a stunning example of the global economy’s fragile dependence on certain software, and the cascading effect it can have when things go wrong.”

Regular readers of this magazine, and of this column in particular, will know where I am going with this: like Windows, GPS — and, more broadly, GNSS — presents a single point of failure for many systems. That is, if GPS fails, it will stop those entire systems from working.

Possible challenges and threats to GPS use include space weather; interference/jamming and/or spoofing of receivers; error or failure of satellites, monitoring, or control; and, in the most extreme case, an attack on satellites, monitoring, or control.

The National Space-Based PNT Advisory Board continues to focus its efforts on its excellent PTA strategy: to protect (“prevent or remove conditions that degrade, distort, or deny GPS use”), toughen (“make GPS use more robust against challenges and threats”), and augment (“provision of GPS enhancements as well as provision and use of alternate [PNT] sources that complement, back up, or replace (partly or entirely) use of GPS”) civil uses of GPS. More on that soon.

Meanwhile, others are urging we think of GNSS as only one of several complementary means to achieve the mission of positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) with accuracy, availability, integrity, continuity and coverage. For that perspective, see Mitch Narins’ piece. He writes that we should focus “on services that are not space-based, operate in different areas of the spectrum, are capable of higher power, and can be installed and evolved more quickly to mitigate emerging threats.”

The European Space Agency’s recent PNT Vision 2035 paper, written by a panel of independent external PNT experts to advise next year’s ESA Ministerial Conference, summarizes European discussions on PNT in the past several years. In the words of Luis Mayo, the chair of the advisory committee that wrote the report, “there is more to PNT than satellite navigation.” While we must “sustain the existing satellite-based navigation systems,” he argues, we should also promote “the development of alternative independent PNT systems.” Read a short interview with Mayo by Dana Goward, starting on page 19.

Yet other efforts integrate GNSS with different, independent techniques to create new synergies. One example is ESA’s Genesis multi-modal space mission, which aims to improve geodetic applications by collocating on board a single well-calibrated satellite the four space-based geodetic techniques: GNSS, very long baseline interferometry (VLBI), satellite laser ranging (SLR) and Doppler Orbitography and Radio-positioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS).

“This first-time collocation in space will establish precise and stable ties among these key techniques,” write the authors of this quarter’s “Innovation” column.

<p>The post First Fix: Global Glitch first appeared on GPS World.</p>

Image: 3DSculptor/iStock / Getty Images Plus/Getty Images

If not GNSS, then what?

An interesting question.

To some, it means GNSS is so important and unique that without it, all is lost. They enthusiastically support only GNSS-centric research and development, believing that any issues that GNSS has today — such as lack of resilience — can be resolved given enough time and money. It includes pushing for the discontinuance of ground-based systems and the “re-purposing” of their resources to produce more satellites and more space-based signals. It demonstrates an admirable and true dedication to the belief that GNSS is the mission.

To others, these words have a different and darker meaning, warning of a clear and present danger. To them, it means “When (not if) GNSS is not available, what other source(s) of positioning, navigation and timing services (PNT) will be available to support GNSS users’ missions and goals?” For these purpose-driven individuals, GNSS is a means — not the mission, which is to provide the necessary positioning, navigation and/or timing performance, such as accuracy, availability, integrity, continuity and coverage, required to ensure the nation’s safety, security and economic well-being.

Unfortunately, some who have made GNSS their mission strive to convince others that it should be their mission, too!

GNSS is magic — but only when it works. It has played and will continue to play a crucial part in advancing our knowledge and abilities and supporting diverse use cases worldwide. It should and must be supported, but not to the exclusion of everything else. Recently, the magic has failed numerous times all around the world and, as a PNT community of suppliers and users, we must know we are capable of so much more.

We also know that the vast majority of civil PNT service needs are local, not global — based in part on the population density of users and their use cases. Over the years, GNSS’ accuracy and coverage have spoiled us. We even chose to see GNSS interference events as proverbial “black swans.” At the same time, the abandoning of well-engineered, resilient local solutions in favor of a global, one-size-fits-all mentality has been appealing to many. We know this approach is fraught with danger. Throwing away perfectly acceptable, resilient local means rather than enhancing them and bringing their technology into the 21st century may, as a PNT community, be our biggest regret. In many ways we have already gone too far.

I encourage our PNT community to commit to doing more, to open up our minds to design, develop, evolve, create, install, implement and operate more resilient PNT sources and more resilient user systems for which PNT services are critical inputs — especially by focusing on services that are not space-based, operate in different areas of the spectrum, are capable of higher power, and can be installed and evolved more quickly to mitigate emerging new threats. Most importantly, we all need to accept and support the true mission of our PNT community, the “why” that drives our innovative solutions: to ensure PNT services always will be available to support our safety, security and economic well-being.

<p>The post If not GNSS, then what? first appeared on GPS World.</p>

Innovation Insights with Richard Langley

IN THE BEGINNING of the space age, there was only one space-based positioning technique: satellite Doppler. Shortly after the launch of the first satellite, Sputnik 1, on Oct. 4, 1957, it was realized that by using a receiver to measure the Doppler frequency shift of a satellite’s transmitted signals combined with knowledge of the satellite’s orbit, the position of the receiver could be determined.

The United States Navy used this concept to develop the Navy Navigation Satellite System, commonly known as Transit. Although its initial use was for positioning Polaris submarines, it was released for commercial use in July 1967. Transit was used worldwide for positioning and navigation until it was decommissioned at the end of 1996. We talked about Transit in the introduction to the article “Easy Peasy, Lemon Squeezy: Satellite Navigation Using Doppler and Partial Pseudorange Measurements” in this column’s October 2012 edition.

Next on the scene was very long baseline interferometry (VLBI). This was, and still is, a technique for high-resolution mapping of galactic and extragalactic radio sources such as quasars. It was invented by Canadian and American radio astronomers with the Canadians getting the first interference “fringes” on a transcontinental baseline on May 21, 1967. VLBI uses radio telescopes, separated by 100s or 1,000s of kilometers, to record signals on storage media (previously magnetic tape and subsequently disk-based systems) synchronized by atomic clocks, typically hydrogen masers. The recordings are played back and cross-correlated at a central facility to produce the observation data – essentially the difference in arrival times of the radio signals at the radio telescopes. It was apparent that VLBI measurements could also be used to precisely determine the vector baselines between pairs of radio telescopes eventually down to a few millimeters, so VLBI became an important geodetic technique, even measuring the drift of the continents in essentially real time. We featured an article on VLBI in this column in February 1996, “The Synergy of VLBI and GPS.”

Around the same time that VLBI was being developed, satellite laser ranging (SLR) made its debut. SLR works by precisely measuring the two-way travel time of laser pulses sent from telescopes on Earth to arrays of corner-cube reflectors on specially equipped satellites. The first experiments were conducted with Beacon Explorer A in 1964. Initial results had a range accuracy of about three meters. Since then, more than 100 satellites have been launched with SLR reflectors, including the GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou and Quasi-Zenith navigation satellites, the Indian regional satellites and a couple of GPS satellites with more to come. Ranging precisions are now as good as a few millimeters. Laser ranging is also conducted using reflector arrays on the surface of the moon. Back in September 1994, we had an SLR article in this column, “Laser Ranging to GPS Satellites with Centimeter Accuracy.”

Skipping over GNSS, with which most of us are very familiar, then came Doppler Orbitography and Radio Positioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS). DORIS was developed in France by a group of institutions led by the Centre National d’Études Spatiales. Rather than transmitting signals from satellites and measuring the Doppler shift at receivers on the ground, the system transmits signals from a global network of ground-based beacons, which are picked up by receivers on specially equipped satellites and the data is subsequently downloaded to Earth. The first such equipped satellite was SPOT-2, launched in January 1990. Since then, 18 more satellites with DORIS receivers on board have been launched to date. DORIS, along with the other techniques, was discussed in the online GPS World article, “NASA Helps Maintain International Terrestrial Frame with GNSS,” published in February 2016.

Like the global navigation satellite systems with the International GNSS Service, the other techniques have their coordinated services, too: the International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS), the International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS), and the International DORIS Service (IDS).

All of these techniques and services contribute to the refinement of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF), on which all positioning activities on Earth eventually depend. Tying the contributions from the different services together involves accounting for any systematic differences, which are reduced in part by using positional data at collocated sites where two or more techniques are sited with the vector ties between the instruments carefully measured. The September 1996 edition of “Innovation” was on the IERS and was aptly titled “International Terrestrial Reference Frame.”

The ITRF will enter a new era with the European Space Agency’s Genesis mission. The mission’s satellite will carry instruments for all four space-geodetic techniques: GNSS, VLBI, SLR and DORIS. In this quarter’s “Innovation” column, a team of Genesis mission engineers and scientists introduce the mission, describe its components and outline its benefits. My well-thumbed copy of the Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English has two definitions for the word “genesis.” The first, with a capital “G,” is the title of the first book of the Old Testament with its well-known first verse. The second is “Origin, mode of formation or generation” and comes from the Greek word genēs, meaning birth, born or produced. It is clearly a fitting name for ESA’s new mission.

<p>The post Innovation Insights: A history of techniques and services that contributed to the refinement of the ITRF first appeared on GPS World.</p>

Genesis satellite.

The combination of advanced technologies for precise orbit determination and timing, as well as the scientific exploitation of GNSS signals, opens major new opportunities for relevant, innovative in-orbit scientific experiments. These opportunities come in the fields of Earth sciences, including geodesy, geophysics and GNSS remote sensing of the atmosphere, land, ocean and ice, fundamental physics, astronomy and time metrology. They could extend some current operational applications such as precise orbit determination for geodesy and altimetry and GNSS radio occultation for meteorology and space weather.

To further enhance the benefits of combining space-based geodetic techniques, the European Space Agency (ESA) has established the Genesis mission. The mission will collocate on board a single well-calibrated satellite, the four space-based geodetic techniques: GNSS, very long baseline interferometry (VLBI), satellite laser ranging (SLR) and Doppler Orbitography and Radio-positioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS). This first-time-ever collocation in space will establish precise and stable ties among these key techniques. The Genesis satellite will be a unique, dynamic space geodetic observatory, whose observations, combined with the measurements using geodetic collocation techniques stations on Earth, will contribute to a significant improvement of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF).

The ITRF is recognized as the foundation for all space- and ground-based observations in Earth science and navigation, and therefore this mission will potentially have a major impact on several GNSS and Earth observation applications. It is a particular realization of the terrestrial reference system, and its history goes back to 1984 when the former Bureau International de l’Heure, which was then in charge of maintaining an accessible reference frame, established a frame using space-based geodetic techniques. The tradition was continued by the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) when it was established in 1987. The IERS has periodically updated the ITRF incorporating new systems, data sets and analysis procedures. The Genesis mission will help identify any systematic errors in the ITRF and thereby improve the accuracy and stability of the frame, particularly the origin and scale of the frame, which are the most critical parameters for scientific applications.

The Genesis mission was endorsed by the ESA Ministerial Council in November 2022. The mission will be executed under the responsibility of ESA’s Navigation Directorate as an element of the Future Navigation Program in cooperation with ESA’s Operations Directorate.

ESA performed an internal mission feasibility study (a so-called concurrent design facility) in March and April 2022. A team of more than 40 experts reviewed the mission objectives and the possible implementation, derived high-level mission requirements, assessed the necessary mission instruments and their technology readiness level and concluded that the mission is feasible and compatible with the Genesis-defined program boundaries.

GENESIS MISSION OBJECTIVES

The overall mission goal, as defined by the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) initiative of the International Association of Geodesy, is to help achieve an ITRF accuracy of 1 millimeter with long-term stability of 0.1 millimeters per year, to be able to detect the smallest variations in the Earth system solid, fluid and gaseous components.

Figure 1: Genesis mission concept.

The improvements of the ITRF will impact and improve multiple geodetic and geophysical observables, as well as precise navigation and positioning, and strengthen the geodetic infrastructure, including the Galileo constellation, by reducing the systematic biases between different observing techniques.

Furthermore, the Genesis mission will allow us to improve the link between the ITRF and the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) due to improvement in determining the Earth orientation parameters (EOPs). The ICRF is a realization of a quasi-inertial reference system defined by extragalactic radio sources, mostly quasars, billions of light years away. The positions of a set of globally distributed VLBI radio telescopes are determined using the difference in the arrival times of the signals at the different telescopes. The ICRF was established and is maintained through a cooperation between the International Astronomical Union and the IERS.

The ITRF and the ICRF are related through the EOPs, which include pole coordinates, the Earth’s rotation angle typically referred to as Universal Time (and the related length of day), and nutation angles and their rates.

GENESIS MISSION OVERVIEW

Figure 2 Genesis project organization.

The baseline orbit of the Genesis satellite will be circular, will have an altitude of about 6,000 kilometers and an inclination of about 95 degrees. The mass of the satellite will be on the order of 250 kilograms to 300 kilogramsg, and it will have very precise on-board metrology, through a single ultra-stable oscillator. An artist’s conception of the satellite in space is shown in the opening image. The launch is foreseen for 2028, and the baseline duration for operations is two years with an option for extension.

The Genesis mission architecture will consist of the Genesis satellite, a ground control segment constituted by a mission control center and a (network of) ground station(s), a data processing center (including a global GNSS sensor station network), a data archiving and distribution center, and the required ground infrastructure for the VLBI, SLR and DORIS campaigns (See FIGURE 1). The scope of the procurement for this mission is the Genesis satellite, the ground control segment, the launch service and two years of operations with the option for extension.

As previously mentioned, the satellite will be launched as the first with all four space-based geodetic techniques on board — namely GNSS, VLBI, SLR and DORIS:

• GNSS receiver. This will be a high-quality multi-constellation (Galileo and GPS) and multi-frequency space receiver. The GNSS observations will be of very high quality and will allow multi-GNSS integer ambiguity resolution for the carrier phase with a very high success rate. This instrument is crucial for the very precise orbit determination of the Genesis satellite.
• VLBI. This instrument will transmit radio signals compatible with receivers at each observing VLBI station. To eliminate the ionospheric dispersive delay along the paths to each station, different frequency bands will be used. The signals will also comply with the evolving observation procedures at all VLBI stations. The signals will be observed by all geodetic VLBI antennas, including the new VLBI Global Observing System (VGOS) fast slewing stations, in their standard geodetic receiver setups. The transmitter currently under development is designed to transmit at different frequencies between 2 GHz and 14 GHz, but also higher frequency bands can be considered. The present setup for regular VGOS observations use four 1-GHz-wide bands within the S, C and X frequency bands. The unit is designed to transmit both pseudo-noise and random noise. The random noise signal mimics the broader-band noise emitted by quasar radio sources routinely observed by VLBI, and hence can be processed essentially by the usual station and correlator software. VLBI observations of Genesis will enable VLBI stations to be accurately located within the ITRF consistently with the other geodetic techniques, enable a frame tie between the celestial frame and the dynamic reference frames of satellite orbits as well as a frame tie between the ITRF and the extremely accurate and stable ICRF.
• SLR. A passive SLR retro-reflector (LRR) will be attached to the satellite in such a way to ensure an adequate field of view when the satellite is in Earth-pointing mode. The SLR observable is the round-trip time of flight of a laser pulse between a ground station and the LLR. Currently, the ITRF long-term origin is defined by SLR, and this is the most accurate satellite technique in sensing the Earth’s center of mass.
• DORIS. Genesis will include a DORIS receiver instrument. DORIS is based on the principle of the Doppler effect between a network of transmitting terrestrial beacons and the on-board instrument. DORIS was first featured on the SPOT-2 satellite launched in 1990. Since then, DORIS receivers have been featured on multiple satellites. The integration of the DORIS receiver on Genesis, given the high-precision knowledge of the Genesis orbit, will benefit other space geodetic techniques from the global DORIS network distribution.

All active instruments will rely on a single high-precision compact frequency standard payload, termed the ultra-stable oscillator.

GENESIS PROJECT ORGANIZATION

The Genesis mission is being procured in an end-to-end approach, meaning that the industry prime is responsible for the development of the satellite, including the payload instruments, the launch services and the satellite operations. For this reason, the following approach has been applied: contract signature was in March 2024. Design, development, validation and acceptance will take place between 2024 and 2027, leading up to a planned launch in 2028.

The contract for Genesis amounts to € 76.6 million. A consortium of 14 entities led by OHB Italia S.p.A. has been tasked with developing, manufacturing, qualifying, calibrating, launching and operating the Genesis satellite, including all its payloads. The mission is supported by Italy, Belgium, France, Switzerland, Hungary and the United Kingdom.

Figure 3 Processing, archiving and distribution of Genesis data and products.

The overall project organization is outlined in FIGURE 2. The ESA Genesis project team, led by the project manager, will manage and coordinate the work of all interfaces among i) the industrial consortium, ii) ESA in its role of handling data processing, archiving and operating the distribution center, iii) the scientific community for whatever the necessary interface is required for the preparation of scientific exploitation and coherency between the project development and the scientific mission objectives.

For the data processing, exploitation, archiving and dissemination of data to the scientific community, the PROcessing, Archiving, exploitation and Dissemination Centre (PROAD) has been set up, (See FIGURE 3), using the European Space Operations Centre (ESOC) Navigation Support Office facilities and the GNSS Science Support Centre (GSSC) of the European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC).

For the data processing required in advance of scientific exploitation of the data, the ESOC Navigation Support Office facilities will be used. The data processing includes the precise orbit determination for the GENESIS satellite.

Figure 4 Genesis science team.

Furthermore, after the processing performed by ESOC, ESAC’s GSSC will be used for data archiving and data distribution for scientific exploitation. The PROAD will be set up and coordinated internally in ESA.

The setup and coordination of the required ground infrastructure, VLBI and SLR campaigns, the DORIS network and so on, will be managed by ESA’s Genesis project team together with a Genesis science team (See FIGURE 4).

The science team will also support ESA’s Genesis project team as required in the reviews and follow-up activities, especially with respect to compliance with the mission objectives.

SUMMARY

The Genesis mission is a very challenging one, which has been made possible by the combined effort from the scientific community, ESA member states, industry and ESA itself. The success of Genesis will strongly depend on the interaction, cooperation and support of the international scientific community. The mission objectives of Genesis address core scientific as well as societal aspects. Above all, the Genesis mission is at the foundation level of all positioning and navigation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This article has drawn, in part, on the multi-author paper “GENESIS: co-location of geodetic techniques in space,” Earth, Planets and Space (2023), Vol. 75, No. 5, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01752-w

<p>The post Innovation: ESA’s multi-modal space mission to improve geodetic applications first appeared on GPS World.</p>

According to ESA’s website, key findings in the paper include:

• Increasing Dependence on PNT Services – particularly for consumer and autonomous solutions. Accurate timing remains a critical use case, especially in telecom and power distribution.
• Geopolitical and Technological Challenges: Rising cyber-attacks, jamming and spoofing, advancements in AI, ML and quantum computing will have significant impacts. Anticipate new regulations.
• Technological Trends Driving PNT Demand: The proliferation of connected devices (IoT), autonomous driving, advanced air mobility, smart grids and autonomous vehicles will drive the demand for resilient and robust PNT.
• System Architecture Evolution: Future PNT systems will utilize a combination of data sources, including multiple GNSS constellations, cellular networks (5G/6G), terrestrial systems, augmentation systems, and autonomous sensors. This “system of systems” approach will enhance performance and ensure independence from single points of failure.
• Emerging Technologies and Sensor Integration: Advances in space segment technologies, receiver designs and sensor integration, new signal designs, flexible payloads, advanced clocks, inter-satellite links, and higher power amplifiers are highlighted.

Luis Mayo

We spoke with Luis Mayo, NAVAC’s chair, to get his take on this seminal work.

Question: To set the stage, what is NAVAC?

Luis Mayo: NAVAC is a group of external PNT experts that ESA has assembled to provide independent advice on navigation issues, and especially for NAVISP.

Q: Where can NAVAC’s formal recommendations be found?

Mayo: We perform an assessment of the NAVISP status every two years. We provide our recommendations as a conclusion of this assessment. Beyond that, our formal recommendations are collected in documents like this white paper or in proposals for modifications or adjustments to the work plans of the programs.

Q: How does ESA leadership generally view and react to NAVAC conclusions and recommendations? Does it act upon every recommendation?

Mayo: They are generally receptive. However, we are just an advisory body, so it is up to them to take on our recommendations. They often do so and use our advice to add weight to their proposal to the Navigation Programme Board, but they do not necessarily have to.

Q: PNT Vision 2035 is a substantial document. Clearly it involved some time and effort. Why was it written? Is it something ESA requested?

Mayo: The paper was the initiative of NAVAC members to inform the ESA Ministerial Conference in 2025. These conferences take place every three years to define the roadmap for the next period. New European space programmes, extensions or redirections of existing ones, and budgets are approved at these meetings.

Q: We thought we might make a modest contribution to the definition of the future ESA navigation programmes. What, if anything, did NAVAC find surprising or unexpected about findings included in the Vision?

Mayo: I would say that we hardly found anything too unexpected or surprising. The findings are the conclusion of multiple discussions on the subject over the past few years. We have just expressed them in a more articulated way.

If anything, and from my personal perspective, I would like to highlight that this exercise helped me realize that the deployment of some of the most exciting or expected applications of PNT technologies — such as autonomous driving — depend on the development and deployment of multiple other technologies that might not be necessarily available in the mid-term.

AVAC’s first meeting in 2018. From left to right: Javier Benedicto, ESA Navigation Director, and NAVAC members Alessandra Fiumara, Peter Grognard, Giorgio Solari, Rafael Lucas Rodriguez, Pierluigi Mancini, Roger McKinlay, Stefano Debei, Nityaporn Sirikan, Bernd Eissfeller and Luis Mayo. (Photo: ESA)

Q: What are the three most important things policymakers should understand from the document?

Mayo: First is that many infrastructures or services critical to the daily lives of the citizens are dependent on PNT technology.

Second, they cannot take for granted that GPS or Galileo services will be always available, not to mention GLONASS or BeiDou. Satellite navigation systems are vulnerable and are continuously under threat. Enabling assured PNT service is a must.

And third, there is more to PNT than satellite navigation. Other complementary or alternative technologies should not be abandoned. In fact, some of those technologies might even change the way in which we have traditionally conceived satellite-based navigation.

Q: What are the most important things policymakers should do to enable the PNT needed by 2035?

Mayo: I think they have to sustain the existing satellite-based navigation systems and foster the development of new technologies and systems that improve the robustness of the services. We have done a lot so far to provide PNT services globally. When you come to think of that, it’s really wonderful what we have achieved this far. We cannot afford to lose what we have, but that has proven not to be enough. Therefore, policymakers should keep helping the development of new technologies and services that complement what we have, improve the quality of the services and ensure its continuous availability and integrity.

They should also look beyond the current service volume. Spacefaring nations should be aware of the fact that they will need this kind of technology to support future missions. Deploying systems able to provide PNT services beyond the coverage of the current GNSS is an absolute necessity to support such missions.

Q: The vision says the EU must consider no longer having access to GLONASS and BeiDou. There are a number of threats that are common to all GNSS. Why not consider loss of access to all either temporarily or permanently?

Mayo: We have not considered a completely catastrophic situation such as losing access to all GNSS in our vision. We understand that GPS, Galileo and eventually other constellations or augmentation systems will remain available and provide at least partial coverage for PNT services.

Q: The vision makes recommendations about mitigating interference, using AI and extending the GNSS service volume. What else should policy and technology decision-makers take from the document and act upon?

Mayo: We must not forget there is a clear case for investing in future PNT systems. ESA should keep up to pace with foreign competitors that seem ready to increase their expenditure in these types of problems.

They also have to be conscious that satellite-based navigation is not enough. We have to look for alternative and complementary systems to reach the level of confidence that we need on PNT solutions.

Q: Perhaps you are thinking of all the PNT systems China has deployed?

Mayo: I am really thinking about what we are not doing in Europe or in the United States. We need to build alternatives that might not have global coverage but would allow us to maintain essential PNT services running at home.

Q: Resilience seems to be an important theme in the document, but it was not the subject of a specific recommendation. Could you speak to that?

Mayo: Resilience is a pervasive theme throughout the whole document. This is a major concern. We have to find a way to build a system of systems that can deliver to the user a trustworthy PNT solution at any time.

Resilience is, today, a key consideration in PNT, and we cannot do anything but acknowledge this fact. We might not have insisted enough on the importance of this feature for future PNT systems, but policymakers must undertake any actions required to improve the resilience of the existing PNT systems and services, probably by promoting the development of alternative independent PNT systems.

Q: What else should GPS World readers know about the Vision?

Mayo: Read the document. It is not that long. Also, think that it has been written from an independent and experienced standpoint. We at NAVAC do not pretend to hold the full truth, but I believe that we have a quite comprehensive view of the matter and that this would be useful for the reader.

<p>The post PNT Vision 2035 – A must read first appeared on GPS World.</p>